|
A Brief Comment
on
Matthew 20:17-28
From the Adult Sunday
School Class on the Kingdom of God – November 27
Matthew 20:17
tells us that Jesus and his disciples were traveling to Jerusalem. This was about a week before Jesus was
crucified. It was at the end of this
journey that Jesus made his triumphal entry into Jerusalem
on a donkey. Because Jerusalem
is located on a hilltop, traveling to Jerusalem
is always referred to as going “up to Jerusalem,”
regardless of whether the person is coming from the north, south, east
or west.
Jesus said that “the Son of Man
will be delivered to the
chief priests and scribes, and they will condemn him to death." The term “Son of Man” was used only to refer
to the Messiah. Since the disciples had
been brought up as devout Jews, they would have known that he was
referring to
the Messiah. They would also have known
that Jesus was referring to himself in the third person, since they had
been
traveling with him for three years and had seen him perform countless
miracles,
cast out demons, confront the Pharisees, heal the sick and raise the
dead.
Jesus goes on to say that he
would be handed over the Gentiles,
mocked, scourged and crucified. He also
said that he would be raised up on the third day. This
is a far cry from the vision of Jesus’
kingdom that the disciples still had. They
envisioned a military victory over the Romans and Jesus ushering in
a new era. It is probably easier
for us to interpret this verse after the fact than it would have been
before
Jesus’ crucifixion and resurrection. Josh McDowell states in “The New
Evidence
That Demands A Verdict” that Jesus never mentions the crucifixion
without also
mentioning the resurrection (p. 206).
After this, the mother of James
and John, the sons of
Zebedee, came asked Jesus to allow her sons to sit at his right and
left hands. This means she was asking
that they be allowed to rule side-by-side with Jesus. Asking
that they be given some of the very
highest positions in heaven is a big request, to say the very least! It’s no wonder that the other ten disciples
were indignant when they heard this. Jesus had
said they would judge the twelve tribes of Israel,
but these would be the highest positions even among the disciples.
Jesus’ response is to tell her
that she doesn’t know what
she is asking. He then asked if they are
able to drink the cup that he is about to drink. The
cup was symbolic of God’s wrath, which
Jesus was about to take upon himself on the cross. Of
course, no one could actually bear that
cup except for Jesus, since he is the only one in human history to be
without sin. The disciples, however, responded
that they
are able to drink the cup that he was about to drink. I
am not sure that the disciples entirely
understood the gravity of what Jesus was asking. That
is the only way someone could actually
say that they could bear that same burden that Jesus took on himself.
Jesus then said they would drink
the cup that he is about to
drink. This is obviously not the cup of
bearing the sin of humanity, but the cup of them being martyred. The apostle John who wrote the gospel of
John, as well as 1, 2 and 3 John, was the only one of the disciples who
was not
martyred (except for Judas Iscariot, of course). Jesus
said that the positions of sitting at
his right and his left are not his to give, but is for those for whom
it has been
prepared by the Father.
Jesus then gave them a whole
different idea of ruling. He contrasted his plan
for leadership with
the way rulers on earth exercise their authority. Rather
than lording authority over others,
people who wish to be great in Jesus’ kingdom must become a servant of
others. Whoever wishes to be first must become a
servant of others. Jesus pointed out
that “even the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and
to give
his life as a ransom for many.” If even
the Son of God is not above being a servant, who are we to think that
we are
above it?
|